As a means of social control, to enforce norms, sanctions a. are always negative. b. are always positive. c. may be mild or severe. d. are not very effective.

c. may be mild or severe.

Explanation:

As a means of social control, to enforce norms, sanctions may be mild or severe.As if we define both ,Norms are social rules of behavior, and a sanction is a form of punishment against violation of different norms.Social values are result of an individual internalizing certain norms and values.The means of enforcing rules are known as sanctions. Sanctions can be positive as well as negative. Positive sanctions are rewards given for conforming to norms. A promotion at work is a positive sanction for working hard. Negative sanctions are punishments for violating norms. Being arrested is a punishment for shoplifting. Both types of sanctions play a role in social control.

Option C.

Explanation:

Social Controls can be simply be defined as the guildlines, the rules and regulations governing a set of norms. And in order to enforce norms, Sanctions are being used.

Looking at option the first and second options, that is options 'a' and 'b', both options are wrong because SANCTIONS can be both Positive and negative and NOT ALWAYS positive or negative but both. When you do some great things, maybe you helped an older person, or do well as a student in your academics, you will receive a positive sanctions and negative sanctions otherwise.

For option 'd', it is not true because sanctions are effective.

Option 'c' is correct because sanctions might be mild or severe. One might be sanction which may leads to prison for someone and sanctions may not lead to prison, but something less severe.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

true