The tuna dolphin case was__

(a) a greenpeace campaign to stop american fishers from killing dolphins while harvesting tuna.
(b) a case that ignited protest at the world trade organization meeting in seattle in 1999. protestors dressed as dolphins and harassed trade ministers.
(c) an international lawsuit brought to gatt by central and south american countries against the us for imposing unfair standards for the harvesting of tuna.
(d) an international campaign by the whale and dolphin conservation society to protect dolphins..

1.3.3 quiz: primary and secondary sourcesquestion 4 of 102 pointsa secondary source is reliable and credible if the person who created thesource is an expert on the topic, is educated and respected in the field ofstudy, and:

Does the amount of material present affect its intensive or extensive properties? explain.

Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.