The u. s. constitution establishes a federal system of government. which statement best describes a federal system of government?
a. a bill of rights protects individual libertiesb. state laws are the highest authority in the nationc. the people elect the president and members of congress d. power is divided between national and state governments

D

Explanation:

out of the above options the most important one that is highlighted is power divided between National and state governments . Before the United States Constitution when we had the Articles of Confederation, power was divided between the national and state governments but not fairly . it seemed that state governments have more power than the national government and that created a lot of problems within the economy and within the law system and within the country itself. When we created the Constitution of the United States of America we use the system called checks and balances which made sure that no one branch or no state government had more power than another and we made sure that power was divided between the national and state governments power was divided between the national and state governments but not fairly . it seemed that steak of Herman's had more power than the national government and that created a lot of problems with in the economy and within the law system and within the country itself. When we created it cost to shine of the United States of america we used a system call checks and balances which made sure that no one branch or no state governments had more power than another and we made sure that power was divided between the Nationals take governments . Currently the national government is higher up than a state government but the state government does still have a lot of Liberties like creating schools and Roads

answer; i believe the correct answer is enlightenment;

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.