Social Studies, 14.01.2020 20:31 stevend0599

In a study by langer, blank, and chanowitz (1978) a requester asked subjects to allow him to cut in front of them in line to make 5 xerox copies. one group of subject received no reason for the request
a second group received a good reason, "because i'm in a rush." a third group received a trivial (placibic) reason, "because i have to make some copies." what happened?

(a) only the group getting the good reason complied more than the group getting no reason. (
b) only the group getting the trivial reason complied more than the group getting no reason.
(c) both of the groups getting a reason of either sort complied more than the group getting no reason.
(d) all of the groups complied about equally.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:00, dommalb

Three of the following renaissance writers are correctly pairedwith a literary work they wrote. who is not? boccaccio - the book of the courtiermachiavelli- the prince erasmus- in praise of follythomas more- utopia

Answers: 3

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30, kellinvagneur

What were the nuremberg laws? who did they target and how? list 3 ways people were targeted by the nazis.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:50, kekerice7350

Historical vs today's presidents (compare)

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, slimt69561

1. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between homo habilis and australopithecus 2. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between cro-magnon and neanderthals.

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

In a study by langer, blank, and chanowitz (1978) a requester asked subjects to allow him to cut in...