When anthropologists bruno latour and steve woolgar observed jonas salk in his lab, they observed that some research findings receive more attention than others within the scientific community. they attributed this to

They attribute this to power struggles within the lab hierarchy.  

Explanation:

In the scientific areas, research is usually carried out, and the scientists in charge of these studies that have the best reviews usually obtain better benefits than the researchers who are unnoticed. Therefore, it is essential to achieve good research results, although this often contributes to a power struggle between collaborators.

In laboratories, this struggle of power can be observed within the scientific hierarchy; this occurs among scientists with more experience, with those who have more time in the area, those who obtain better results, and those who want to achieve better benefits.

For example, in the case of anthropologists, Jona Salk observed that in some research he gave more importance to some results than others, he tried to show his power in the laboratory hierarchy and benefit some scientists.

I hope this information can help you.

i do believe that the correct answer is   (technical reasoning); luck

explanation:

try something like republic or democracy joined or something because its talking about a election party.