Your friend is looking over your shoulder while you are reading in your abnormal psychology textbook about conduct disorders. your friend says, "conduct disorder just sounds like another term for juvenile delinquency." is your friend correct or incorrect?
a. correct: these two terms describe the same condition. b. incorrect: people with conduct disorders do not usually break the law. c. incorrect: conduct disorder is diagnosed in children, not adolescents. d. incorrect: juvenile delinquency is a legal classification, not a psychological diagnosis.

d. Incorrect: juvenile delinquency is a legal classification, not a psychological diagnosis.

Explanation:

In abnormal psychology, a conduct disorder is a mental disorder diagnosed in childhood or adolescence that consists in a repetitive pattern of behavior in which the basic rights of others are violated. These people constantly violate social norms and engage in antisocial behaviors.

Juvenile delinquency is the act of participating in acts against the law, these acts are made by minors. However, this term has to do with law and not with abnormal psychology. Juvenile delinquents do not necessarily have a psychological diagnosis.

Therefore, the correct answer would be: d. Incorrect: juvenile delinquency is a legal classification, not a psychological diagnosis.

i'd have to with d.

explanation:

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals