Discuss how contemporary activities of these two branches of the u. s. government compare and contrast with the intentions of the founders. use specific examples, and include support from at least 3 sources, 1 of which can be your textbook. your examination of the topic should include information about the following:
structure and makeup of congress differences between the house of representatives and the senate powers granted to congress and the president under the constitution checks and balances of power, considering congress and the president roles and responsibilities of the president evolution of presidential power.

In the United States of America the congress is formed by two different chambers.

Explanation:

In the United States of America the congress is formed by two different chambers. The first one is the the House of Representatives and the second one is the Senate. According to this structure the congress is considered a bicameral legislature structure that operates in the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Both structures are important for the development of the tasks proper of the congress. The lower house, The house of representatives is the elected for a period of two years and every congress individual represents a specific district, they are encouraged of presenting amendments, introducing bills and resolutions.

On the other hand, the upper house, The Senate has different powers which include to present revenue bills, destitute federal officials, in case of tie in the presidential elections the senate is the one that chooses the president.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

c- companies fail to take environmental protection into account. i think