which of the following best describes one purpose of the concluding
paragraph in a compare-and-contrast essay?
o
a. to explain why the two things are being compared
f
o
b. to present evidence that shows how two things differ
pesert
o
c. to introduce reasons why the two things are similar
series
c
re
serer
o
free
d. to explain the larger implication of the comparison
sesso
reshers

D. To explain the larger implication of the comparison.

Explanation:

in a conclusion, you don't really want to address new information it's more to end it and do an overview of the whole paper.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

ne pare rău, dar când mi-am căutat întrebarea, doar avioanele au apărut .. deci, ar putea fi răspunsul, sau ar putea fi baloane cu aer cald, deoarece acestea pot conta și ca ambarcațiunile de aer, dar nu sunt complet sigur de asta. a fost doar o presupunere, sper că am ajutat, îmi pare rău dacă nu am făcut-o. de asemenea, folosesc traducerea google, pentru a traduce ceea ce spun în engleză, așa că îmi pare rău dacă gramatica sau chiar limba nu este corectă