American officers take an oath to "defend the constitution of the us against all enemies, foreign and domestic." they also are supposed to obey the president as their commander in chief. what problems can arise from this obligation to obey the orders of our political leaders?

Problems could arise from this obligation to obey the orders of political leaders.

Explanation:

A problem could arise In a situation where the political leader performs an action that could be considered as going against the Constitution of the United States.

For instance, if a political leader solicits help from a foreigner to help him win an election and his political aide is in the know of this, the aide is caught between upholding the integrity of the Constitution of the United States and reporting to the relevant authorities OR keeping quiet if told to do so by the political leader.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

a would be the answer