subject
Social Studies, 07.12.2019 07:31 111432

Is the element in the promotional mix that evaluates people's attitudes, identifies issues that may elicit their concern, and executes programs to gain their understanding and acceptance.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:10, Treezy11
In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30, shaelyn0920
Did cuneiform develop the language we use today
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, datzmypupppup
The banking act of 1933, also known as the glass-steagall act, established the federal deposit insurance corporation (fdic), which a protected banks from failure by ensuring that the government would bail them out if necessary. b required american taxpayers to establish an account with a commercial bank. c protected depositors from financial losses when banks failed.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Is the element in the promotional mix that evaluates people's attitudes, identifies issues that may...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 15.09.2021 22:10
Konu
History, 15.09.2021 22:10
Konu
Mathematics, 15.09.2021 22:10