Awoman discloses to a friend that she was raped. the friend asks, "what were you wearing and were you drinking too much? " this is an example of

Victim blaming

Explanation:

Victim blaming refers to the phenomenon that occurs when the victim of a crime or any wrongful act is held entirely or partially at fault for the harm that was done to them. It refers to the perception that victims are, in a way, responsible for the actions of their offenders.

In this example, a woman tells her friend that she was r ap ed, the friend asks what she was wearing and if she was drinking too much, as if the victim had provoked the offender and as if he clothes she was wearing or the state she was influenced on the fact of having been ra pe d. Thus, by making this comment, the friend has the perception that the woman was, in a way, responsible. Therefore, this would be an example of victim blaming.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; self-efficacy;