When her car broke down, jennifer asked her neighbor for a ride to the store a few blocks away, and her neighbor agreed. the next day, with her car still not operable, jennifer asked the same neighbor for a ride to her attorney's office, which was more than an hour's drive from the house. feeling pressure to be consistent, her neighbor agreed again. by asking for a small favor before a larger one, jennifer was relying on the technique to encourage her neighbor's cooperation.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Why is corruption not effectively reduced in nepal

2) based on the information, which is an opinion rather than a fact about immigrants to north america? immigrants