Professor karney administered a psychological test measuring shyness to a large number of undergraduate students. the students also completed a lengthy questionnaire on their social life and activities, including number of friends. professor karney conducted a statistical analysis of the responses and found a correlation coefficient of –.80 between level of shyness and number of friends. this indicates that:

as number of friends decreases, level of shyness increases

Explanation:

The correlation coefficient can take  values which ranges from +1 to -1.

0 is a value which shows that any two variables are not associated with each other. A value that is more than 0 shows the positive association, that is,   one variable's value increases as the other variable's value do so.

Here in the question the correlation coefficient of –.8 shows that the level of shyness increases as the number of friends increases.

Thus the answer is --

as number of friends decreases, level of shyness increases.

mali had been a state inside of the ghanaian empire. after ghana fell because of invading forces and internal disputes, mali rose to greatness under the leadership of a legendary king named sundiata, the "lion king." the songhai empire, already weakened by internal political struggles, went into decline.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.