When steven simkin and laura blank divorced in 2006, they agreed to split their $13.5 million fortune evenly. two years later, it became evident that simkin had a problem: his half was invested in bernard madoff’s giant ponzi scheme and he lost millions. simkin asked blank to revise their deal and she refused, so he sued to rescind their 2006 settlement based on mutual mistake of fact. he argued that the fatal mistake was that neither party knew that his half was invested in a fraud. should a court invalidate the settlement for this mistake?

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.

answer; disconfirm the catharsis theory;

answer; /// the statement is false,false,false;