Explain the following lines (104-110): "this gentlemen, the prince’s near ally, my very friend, hath got his mortal hurt in my behalf - my reputation stained with tybalt’s slander — tybalt, that an hour hath been my cousin. 0 sweet juliet, thy beauty hath made me effeminate and in my temper softened valor’s steel! "

What do these fatwas indicate with regard to the balance between practical legal reasoning and religious dictates answers?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

All of the following apply to a company’s stockholders except: a. they make all company decisions. b. they are also called shareholders. c. they may sell their stock to others. d. they are entitled to share in company profits .