subject
Social Studies, 18.11.2019 17:31 mlyons574

Aconsultant was hired to study coal miners’ occupational safety hazards and motivation to engage in safety behaviors. when the consultant asked the miners why they refused to practice safe work behaviors (such as wearing a helmet), they replied, "when it’s your time to go, it’s your time to go." the coal miners exhibited:

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:50, blanca04fp
Cooper's contribution to the american novel was savestylesformat instructions
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00, nyameneak
Which of the following statements best describes relations between india and pakistan? a. the countries have had peaceful relations since the partition of india. b. the countries have an ongoing trade dispute with bangladesh. c. the countries have had conflicts over the region of kashmir. d. the countries have agreed not to develop nuclear weapons.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00, aredding6282
Aman and woman agreed to burn down a neighbor's house in retribution for some wrong the neighbor allegedly committed against them. both the man and woman were arrested shortly after they poured gasoline on the neighbor's front porch. the man revealed to the police that he participated in the plan to ensure that nothing bad would happen to the neighbor, and that he had made an anonymous telephone call to the police alerting them to the crime, which enabled the police to arrest him and the woman in the act. the woman stated that she would not have participated if not for the man's encouragement. if the woman is charged with a conspiracy at common law to commit arson, how should she be found?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Aconsultant was hired to study coal miners’ occupational safety hazards and motivation to engage in...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 11.06.2021 19:50
Konu
English, 11.06.2021 19:50
Konu
English, 11.06.2021 19:50