Imagine that you are an ethnographer studying a foreign culture. during the course of your research, several members of the group come to regard you as their friend and confide in you about different subjects. when you are writing the ethnography, you are faced with the decision about whether to include the information or not. the information is a key piece of illustration for a point that you are making, but you know that the people who told you may be angry if you include it. what would you do in this situation? would you include the information? why or why not?

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.

i'm not sure what you are asking, but it also served as a debtors colony, was ran by the trustees for 20 years until becoming a royal colony, and people had restrictions such as no slaves, and only 50 acres of land per person/ hope this !

- jack watson

answer; education;

answer; the above statement is ( false );