subject
Social Studies, 08.11.2019 02:31 norinashanleyc

Hack registers as a conscientious objector during the vietnam war. he believes that it is wrong to take human life. he is willing to serve time in jail, rather than take part in an armed conflict. jack's reasons for not going to war reflect the stage of moral reasoning established by kohlberg.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00, jeremiahphillip4396
Candace is a flight attendant for a large, international airline. while in china, candace often finds look-alikes in famous designer brands of watches, handbags, clothing, and golf clubs. in fact, she'll do her christmas shopping there and will even buy good-quality items for auctioning at her son's preschool events back in the u. s. candace's actions demonstrate
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30, july00
Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:00, makeithappen60
Which is one factor that contributed to the rise of sikhism? a. the spread of christianity into india b. opposition to the hindu caste system c. objections to the five pillars of islam d. a return to polytheistic religion
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Hack registers as a conscientious objector during the vietnam war. he believes that it is wrong to t...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 27.12.2019 04:31