For bengü sezen at columbia university, over the course of a decade, conducted a massive and sustained effort to manipulate and falsify research data. she even created fictitious people and organizations to back up her data and results. sezen was found guilty of 21 counts of research misconduct, with at least nine papers found to be falsified, fabricated, plagiarized, or unable to be replicated. true / false.

True

Explanation:

          Bengü Sezen, a chemistry graduate joined the research group under professor Dalibor Sames in 2000 at Columbia University.  She was considered as a prized student by her professor Sames and turned out to be a talented student in the training.

          But Sezen had made several fraud in her Ph.D papers under the name of Dalibor Sames. She tried to publish several her now-retracted and fraudulent papers.

          Later Bengü Sezen was found guilty of misconducting and doing fraud with her research work.

Thus the answer is TRUE.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; cultural trait;