In a motion to dismiss filed in the federal district court for the district of connecticut, you write that "states disagree about whether grandparent visitation statutes may be invoked only in the course of other custody proceedings." you wish to offer support for this proposition by comparing two cases from courts that reached opposite conclusions on the issue. the first case is frame versus nehls "holding that the state’s grandparent visitation statute did not apply in a paternity action because it was not an action for child custody." frame is a 1996 michigan supreme court case reported in volume 550, page 739, of north western reporter, second series. the second case is castagno, et al., versus wholean, et al., "reversing the dismissal of a grandparent’s visitation petition for lack of jurisdiction in the absence of death, divorce, or a child custody proceeding." castagno is a 1996 supreme court of connecticut case reported in volume 684, page 1181, draft the citation that should follow your statement. [note: remember that the brief will be filed in a federal district court.]