Assume that the marginal propensity to consume out of disposable income is 0.8 and that the government taxes all income at a constant rate of 30 percent. if gross income increases by $100, consumption will initially increase by $44 a $56 b $70 c $80 d $

The answer to this question is $56.

Explanation:

In this question the consumption will initially increase by 56 because when we take 30 percent of the $100 it will give the $30. and when we less the money then the amount will be $70. after multiply the value by 0.8 it will give the 56.0. so the answer of the question is $56.

Example:

100*30/100=30

100-30=70

70*0.8=56.0.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

i would think yes.

explanation:

because we have every natianlity in our country which makes us so diverse and unique. that's why in a lot of cities there are places like little italy, koreatown, chinatown.