Which statement best compares georgia’s royal colony period to its trustee period?

The answer is A.

These are the options

A. The royal colony was more economically successful than the trustee period.

B. The royal colony reduced citizen land ownership in comparison to the trustee period.

C. The royal colony involved less citizen participation in the government than the trustee period.

D. The royal colony restricted slave ownership while the trustee period allowed slave ownership.

Explanation:

During the trustee period, Georgia was governed by a Board of Trustees., which is controlled by King George. During their leadership in Georgia, they created some rules that caused some  sort of economic damage within its territory.

For example:

- They banned the use of Rum in Georgia, which is one of their popular commodities.

- They also outlawed the use of slavery for Georgia's plantations, which lead to the decrease of Georgia's economic output.

unknown. best bet to watch it is at kissanime (a lot of popups and has ads and has potential to be a virus not recommended) or crunchyroll (recommended but has ads and has no popups). you will have to wait. i really want netflix to give the other seasons.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.