Martha and sarah have the same preferences and incomes. martha arrived at the theater to see a play, and she discovered that she had lost the $ 10 ticket she had purchased earlier. sarah also just arrived at the theater planning to buy a ticket to see the same play, when she discovered that she had lost a $ 10 bill from her wallet. if both martha and sarah still have enough money to pay for a ticket, is one of them more likely than the other to go ahead and see the play anyway?

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

How is the uk’s government is solving the air pollution problem?

Which of these best describes why president franklin d. roosevelt created the new deal?