The governor of the state of michigan has stated that the water supply of flint (a city in michigan) does not constitute a major threat to the public health. furthermore, his cabinet members agree with him on this point. accordingly, we conclude that the water supply of flint (a city in michigan) does not constitute a major threat to the public health. is the inductive argument strong or weak?

Weak

Explanation:

An inductive contention is a contention where it is imagined that the premises gives the reasons that supports the probable truth of the conclusion.  

In an inductive contention, the premises are planned uniquely to be solid to the point that, in the event that they are valid, at that point it is improbable that the conclusion is false.  

The case mentioned doesn't have any legitimate contention showing the explanation that water is anything but a significant risk. There is an understanding among them and therefore they think they are right.