Your friend, despite never taking a psychology class, insists that he knows all about psychology, because the results of all psychology studies are just common sense. try to convince him he is wrong by discussing at least 2 reasons/biases that demonstrate that psychology is not necessarily common sense or something you can know without studying. be sure to explain how and/or why these 2 reasons/biases demonstrate that psychological principles are not just common sense

In general terms, given that psychology is the study of how the human mind works, how it originates, develops, grows, and interacts with the environment and with other minds, saying that the study of this field is easy, and simple common sense, shows ignorance. There is absolutely nothing easy, or common sense, about the human mind, and even those who say, like in this case, that it is just "common sense", do not know themselves at all.

And in research, this blatant ignorance is being further displayed by the friend, when he says that psychological research, and its findings, are also common sense. From the very first theoretical roots of psychology, to the very last, what is today known is that the human mind, and discovering how it works, is still not fully understood and this is why psychology cannot be taken as "common sense". What a lot of researchers have come to find with their studies on the human mind, is that knowing what is being done, and why it is being done, is paramount to getting proper answers, and this is vital because psychological research guides most other fields of study, as it pertains to explaining how we, our minds, work.

If we just take the topic of biases in research on psychology, then we can show this friend how wrong he is. For example, there are many forms of biases in psychological research that can happen, and which, if the researcher is not aware of them, and how they play a role in final results, wrong theories may be given on how our mind works. One such bias is the response bias, where, a tool used to measure certains factors is done in a way that responses are not unique to the respondent but geared to satisfy a specific requirement from researchers. This will yield wrong results. A second bias, among the many that exist, is the samplin bias, in which, a researcher may choose the wrong size of a sample, and not represent the population, or select people in such a manner that the candidates are not in any way representatives of a larger group. This bias will ensure that results are absolutely invalid, and may cause more harm than good.

Like these two, there are many more biases that can happen to people who perform, or read, psycological research, and do not have the necessary knowledge to apply the proper techniques.

explanation:

kill anyone that got in the way

the answer is "meiosis ii in the mother".

the procedure of meiosis includes two divisions of the hereditary material. the main division is known as the decrease division – or meiosis i – on the grounds that it lessens the quantity of chromosomes from 46 chromosomes or 2n to 23 chromosomes or (n depicts a solitary chromosome set). in people, the decrease division results in two sperm cells each with 23 chromosomes or an egg cell with 23 chromosomes and one disposed of polar body. the second division – or meiosis ii – is called equational division. the two sperm cells split again creating four sperm cells, each with 23 or n chromosomes. in oogenesis, the egg cell and polar body partition to shape the ovum and two extra polar bodies. along these lines, the posterity are guaranteed to get one portion of the chromosomes from the mother and one half from the dad.