Apolitical scientist asked a group of people how they felt about two political policy statements. each person was to respond a (agree), n (neutral), or d (disagree) to each policy statement. a. describe the sample space; that is, list all possible response combinations to the two statements. b. assuming each response combination in part (a) is equally likely, what is the probability the person being interviewed agrees with at least one of the two policy statements? c. assuming each response combination in part (a) is equally likely, what is the probability the person being interviewed agrees with exactly one of the two political policy statements? d. assuming each response combination in part (a) is equally likely, what is the probability the person being interviewed agrees with the two political policy statements?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.