In 2016, two california men were charged with involuntary manslaughter after a fire at their dilapidated warehouse killed 36 people. in court, the defendants asked for prison sentences of six and nine years. the judge turned down the defendants, claiming they did not accept "full responsibility and remorse" for the fire. what arrangement are the california defendants (and their attorneys) attempting?

Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order