Aclassic movie about the end of the world showed a floating island on what was the pacific ocean. in the middle of the movie filming, the set sank in a hurricane. the producers who had already spent $70 million on the set were faced with a new cost of $50 million to rebuild the set. expected additional costs continued to be $100 million. the expected revenues were $160 million. should they have rebuilt the set and finished the movie? a. yes. the set sank. what is it about sunk costs that you do not understand? b. no. the loss on the movie was $160 million minus $220 million, a loss of $60,000c. one cannot tell. they may have though that revenues would be higherd. one cannot tell. they may have thought that costs from that point on might have been lower

Cannot have a correct answer if you don´t have the exact costs/revenues.

Explanation: Cinematographic business has always been one of the less clear investment in terms of revenues.

You can have a defaukt budget, a well marked limit with no possibilities of increasing it. Spending less depends on the agreements with production and direction.

But, revenues are different. You can make a calculation, but in the end only time and viewers will decide if the movie was affordable.

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great