Jonah and elias are participants in a research study. one task involves reading an ambiguous story, which participants can interpret in a variety of ways. jonah interprets the story as threatening. elias, however, interprets the story as comical. based on this information alone, what conclusion can you draw about jonah and elias?
a. jonah experiences higher levels of anxiety than elias.
b. elias tends to disregard others’ feelings, whereas jonah is highly sensitive to others’ feelings.
c. elias is at increased risk of schizophrenia compared to jonah.
d. jonah and elias have opposing personality disorders.

A. Jonah experiences higher levels of anxiety than Elias.

Explanation:

Since Jonah interprets the story as threatening on the other hand  Elias interprets the story as comical.The story has different elements.So the person's condition came out .In which state he is right now,how he is feeling.The thing is that the state in which the person is displayed by his or her interpretations.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; role-taking;