Garvey files a suit in a state court against hi-rise apartments. at the conclusion of garvey’s case, hi-rise files a motion asking the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant on the ground that garvey has presented no evidence to support his claim. this is a motion for

judgment as a matter of law

Explanation:

According to my research on the United States court system, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is a motion for judgment as a matter of law. This motion basically claims that the opposing party does not have in his possession sufficient enough evidence to reasonably support its case, and should therefore be thrown out. Which is what is happening in this situation.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .