Assume that before manin renewed his flight certification, the national transportation safety board (ntsb) decided to change its policy to require pilots to disclose on renewal applications all criminal offenses, excluding moving traffic violations, (e. g., traffic ticket(s) for speeding). this policy change was implemented because the ntsb had reason to believe that more pilots were being convicted of misdemeanor offenses than in the past. because it did not seem to be an issue in the past, the ntsb had not requested the information on any new or renewal certifications. the primary goal of this change was to protect the public, (e. g, the passengers). the ntsb met with the pilots’ union for input before making a final decision. notification of this policy change was disseminated through the pilots’ union at its request and was also included on the renewal certification application itself and in the instructions. manin failed to disclose his misdemeanor criminal offenses, and the ntsb denied his renewal certification. what are the answers for 1 and 2 of the choices in parenthesis? 1. given these facts, the ntsb’s decision (would, would not) be arbitrary and capricious.2.why? the ntsb (did, did not) follow their own procedures regarding flight certifications.