The difference between intentional torts and torts involving negligence is that, in torts involving negligence, the tortfeasor does not wish to bring about the consequence of the act, nor does she or he believe it will occur. t/f

The correct answer is T (True)

Explanation:

In law, a tort refers to a civil wrong or action against the law that causes harm or loss to another person and therefore should be regulated by law, especially concerning civil remedies. Additionally, torts can be classified as intentional if the action occurred intentionally which means the individual was aware of the damages or consequences of his/her acts or as related to negligence which means the civil wrong was not intentional, but occurred as the tortfeasor (person who commits a tort) did not consider possible consequences or was unable to avoid these consequences as it occurs in car accidents or collisions that cause other people damages but in most cases are unintentional. Thus, the statement presented is true as in torts involving negligence the tortfeasor does not consider the consequences of the act.

the answer is true .

the best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "less supportive to the war of 1812"

the war of 1812 was a military conflict that lasted from june 1812 to february 1815, fought between the united states of america and the united kingdom, its north american colonies, and its native american allies.

i hope my answer has come to your . god bless and have a nice day ahead!