Do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor? (a) no; most jurors are more sympathetic to poor people than to the rich, and the jurors’ sympathies affect their findings. (argument strong / argument weak) (b) no; because rich people can afford to hire better lawyers than poor people, and juries are influenced by the skill of the opposing lawyers. (argument strong / argument weak)

in 342 bc j._c. egypt fell into the hands of the persians, under the reign of nectanebo ii

greek city-states unite in a revolt against the persian empire at the beginning of the fifth century bc. j.-c  

from the year 660 or 659 bc ad, cyrus preached the revolt against the medes to deliver the persians.

the invasive species was introduced due to commercial purpouses, as there was a demand for fur clothes and hence, a business opportunity connected to this product. actually, it was when the nutrias scaped, causing harm to the us ecosystems when they acquired the status of invasive species. in this case they have caused an environmental problem, but it could have affected also economic interests or even human health.

aren't cheetos good enough to be president?

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.