In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determine the type of plagiarism
original version
major changes within organizations are usually initiated by those who are in power. such decision-makers sponsor the change and then appoint someone else - perhaps the director of training - to be responsible for implementing and managing change. whether the appointed change agent is in training development or not, there is often the implicit assumption that training will "solve the problem." and, indeed, training may solve part of the the result is that potentially effective innovations suffer misuse, or even no use, in the hands of uncommitted users.
references:
dormant, d. (1986). the abcds of managing change. in introduction to performance technology (p. 238-256). washington, d. c.: national society of performance and instruction.
student version
when major changes are initiated in organizations, there is often the implicit assumption that training will 'solve the problem.' and, indeed, training may solve part of the problem (dormant, 1986, p. 238).
references:
dormant, d. (1986). the abcds of managing change. inintroduction to performance technology (p. 238-256). washington, d. c.: national society of performance and instruction.
which of the following is true for the student version above? (a) word-for-word plagiarism(b) paraphrasing plagiarism(c) this is not plagiarism

(C) This is not plagiarism

Explanation:

In this type of research, plagiarism is the act of using the ideas of someone else without acknowledging the owner of the original idea.

From the example above, the student clearly provided the information regarding where he/she citate the information along with additional reference of the original works. This is considered as an acknowledgement. Because of this, it can't be considered as plagiarism.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )