This time i need with the british one. i am stuck! you!

Ok The 1st 2 answers are easy. The Spanish found gold in the new Americas and the British just wanted a piece of that and first landed all along the north half of the east coast. Lots of the sailors and crew members were looking for a fresh start a shot at getting rich and escaping the laws and such of British rule. I believe the last would be to establish trade routes as well. The Spainish were more obsessed with converting the native and being a native american myself... that history is quite, well brutal. I don't really think the British cared that much about converting them (even though it did happen) it wasn't their main intention

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

your answer should be c, it seems to be the only one that makes sense. mark me branliest : )