Larissa was opposed to animal cruelty and decided to attend an animal rights rally. after the rally, larissa experienced intensification in her views. specifically, she became a vegetarian and decided to stop using products tested on animals. her shift in opinion could be explained by:

"Group Polarization"

Explanation:

According to my research on the different social psychological terminology, I can say that Larissa's shift or intensification of her opinion can e called "Group Polarization". This is a term that refers to the tendency of a group or person to make a choice that is way more extreme that their initial belief. This is what is going on because, Larissa's belief on animal rights did not change but it did intensify greatly after the rally.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

fast by juice wrld

explanation:

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.