subject
Social Studies, 03.08.2019 00:30 daverius3153

Roberta is trying to decide whether or not to vote for a political candidate. based on what she has read about him, she has concluded that he is not qualified for the position, but she agrees with his political positions. also, she trusts him and likes his decisive personality. in fact, she likes him so much that she sent a small donation to his campaign. her sending a donation to the campaign represents the component of her attitude toward him
a. affective
b. cognitive
c. behavioral
d. situational

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00, HAMILTRASHANDIKNOWIT
Explain the events that led to the iranian revolution and the following iranian hostage crisis. how was the united states involved with iran? describe the arab-israeli conflicts of the 20th century. be sure to include specific military interventions, peace agreements, and the ultimate reason for conflict.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:20, batmanmarie2004
Ageneral requirement for the informed consent form is that it may not include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a general requirement for the informed consent form is that it may not include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language?
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30, aronhaile
Growth of the business (be sure to use the terms “culture” and “cultural diffusion” in this section.) of debbie fields. plz me
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Roberta is trying to decide whether or not to vote for a political candidate. based on what she has...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 03.12.2020 14:00