The president of the united states and the leader of a bordering foreign nation agreed that each should appoint three members to a special joint commission to deal with a wildlife problem. the president of the united states, acting in concert with the foreign leader, named the joint commission as a permanent enforcement agency for the regulations that were adopted by both nations. although the president received prior congressional authorization to enter into this agreement, the senate did not ratify the agreement by a two-thirds vote. the president then entered into an executive agreement with the foreign leader whereby the joint commission was granted adjudicative as well as enforcement powers with respect to a particular issue. is the executive agreement by the president valid?

Yes, the executive agreement by the President is valid

Explanation:

An executive agreement is an agreement between the United States (made by the current president) and a foreign government that has the same force as treaties but that is less formal, does not necessarily bind the president's successor and does not need to be ratified by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate in order to become valid like treaties require.

This presidential power is not specifically stated in the U.S. Constitution, however, the president is authorized to have it as one of their powers in the area of foreign affairs. Therefore, the executive agreement that the President made with the foreign leader is completely valid.

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.