An automotive engineer announced that he had developed a carburetor that will enable cars to achieve 100 miles per gallon of fuel, and that he will allow the carburetor to be inspected next month. soon after, a former employer of the engineer brought an action to prohibit the engineer from displaying the carburetor, claiming that the engineer probably had stolen the carburetor's design from the employer. the court granted the employer a temporary restraining order prohibiting the engineer from disclosing any mechanical details of his carburetor, and ordered a hearing to be held in one week to determine whether a preliminary injunction should be issued. because each party would have to reveal the mechanical details of his designs at the hearing, the employer requested that the hearing be closed to the public and that the record be sealed to avoid revelation of his designs. the court granted the request. a reporter for a monthly automobile magazine heard about the case and wanted to attend the hearing. when he was told that the hearing would be closed, he filed an action to have it opened. what is the reporter's best argument for opening the hearing? a closure is not necessary to preserve an overriding interest here. b the right of freedom of the press is extensive and allows the press to attend all hearings of interest to the public. c closure here amounts to a prior restraint. d under the fairness doctrine, the magazine will be required to give each litigant an opportunity to present his side of the case.