Acompany operated a small amusement park on property it owned near a residential neighborhood. on a day when the park was closed, a 10-year-old girl snuck into the park with some friends by climbing over a chain link fence. while climbing on one of the carnival rides, the girl slipped and cut her leg on an exposed gear assembly, sustaining serious injuries. through her guardian ad litem, the girl brought suit against the company to recover damages for her injuries. at trial, she presented evidence of the accident and her injuries. in defense, the company established that the girl read and understood the "no trespassing" signs that were attached to the fence. the company also established that it had not had any previous reports of children sneaking into the park when it was closed. before submission of the case to the jury, the company moved for summary judgment. is the court likely to grant the company's motion? a yes, because the girl was a trespasser who the company had no reason to anticipate would be on the property. b yes, because the girl knew she was trespassing and was old enough to recognize the danger. c no, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park. d no, because the appeal of the carnival rides attracted the girl into the park.

the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.

Explanation:

In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

yes

it is because 3 because the citizen the northern democratic party watned the warning on red to blue because it is purple. lol