Jasper buys a can of zaps bug spray. the first time jasper sprays some on his arm, the can explodes, causing deep cuts on his face that require surgery. jasper sues zaps. which of the following facts, if true, would most zaps' defense? a. zaps exercised incredible care in manufacturing the bug spray and the cans, and there had never been an incident like this before. b. zaps is not in privity with jasper, because jasper bought the bug spray from the store and not from zaps. c. the shop that sold jasper the bug spray had kept the bug spray in an extremely hot storage room, and the extreme temperature is what made the can explode. d. zaps is an expert in bug spray development and has been exclusively in the bug spray business for 26 years.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.