subject
Social Studies, 28.06.2019 00:20 jessicawelch25

Paul plaintiff, a resident of texas, files a lawsuit in texas against don defendant, a resident of california. don receives notice of the lawsuit, and tells his lawyer, "i don't want to travel to texas to be sued by this guy." don's lawyer says, "maybe you don't have to." the lawyer argues that the texas court lacks personal jurisdiction over don. paul's lawyer asserts that the court does have personal jurisdiction, and that the case should proceed.
six months before, don travelled to texas, signed a contract with paul while he was there, and returned to california. he has made no other trips to texas, and has had no other interactions with the state.
in paul's lawsuit, he alleges that don has breached that contract.
which of the following types of personal jurisdiction does the texas court have over don?
a. general personal jurisdiction
b. specific personal jurisdiction
c. both a and b
d. none of the above

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:10, brebun4742
Which group had an easier time adapting to american life because of similar backgrounds?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:00, syulerio8418
What is the term used for the belief that the white race is superior to all other races
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30, kellyrasmussen8189
What is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration. what is the difference between binding and non-binding arbitration? a. non-binding arbitration means that the arbitration hearing is not held in a court room. b. binding arbitration means that the parties have agreed they will not challenge in court the ruling from the arbitration c. binding arbitration exists only at the appellate level of the court system. d. non-binding arbitration occurs when the court does not have jurisdiction over one of the parties in the arbitration.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00, myalee1419
Abasic premise of the national response framework is that: a. most incidents begin and end locally and are managed at the local or tribal level. b. response partners use nonstandard structures to allow for flexible and scalable responses. c. readiness to act encourages response partners to self-dispatch to an incident scene. d. incidents should be managed at the highest jurisdictional level possible.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Paul plaintiff, a resident of texas, files a lawsuit in texas against don defendant, a resident of c...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 17:01
Konu
Health, 20.09.2020 17:01
Konu
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 17:01
Konu
World Languages, 20.09.2020 17:01