subject

Carmen conducted an experiment to determine if listening to different types of music would affect a person’s pulse. her hypothesis was that pulse rate would change with different types of music. each person listened to seven different selections of music for 30 seconds each. each person’s pulse was taken before the music and then after each 30-second interval of music. the pulses were taken again after the music selections were completed. based on her experiment, carmen concluded that a person’s pulse rate changed when the person listened to different types of music. what might be something carmen should keep constant in her experiment?

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30, hjamileth77
1. what is the electoral college? 



Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30, silvajimena74
What specific words do you hear in dr. king’s speech that are powerful
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31, antonio9768
Which of the following makes someone an entrepreneur? a.) becoming a partner in a major law firm b.) becoming a highly paid dancer c.) earning a lot of money as a computer programmer d.) running a company that hires people to fix computers
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Carmen conducted an experiment to determine if listening to different types of music would affect a...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Computers and Technology, 05.07.2020 06:01