Read the excerpt.

the parents out there already know what i’m talking about: the mothers and fathers taking on second jobs, the folks getting bills for their children’s education they cannot pay. and this is an education they thought they’d saved for. i say, enough! a college education should not be a privilege but a right.

the excerpt is best characterized as an

opening statement.
plan of action.
summary.
conclusion.

Afull irb committee meeting is convened and one agenda item is a new research proposal to evaluate how mothers interact with their learning-disabled child. the inclusion criteria require the children to be a minimum of five years of age. the protocol requires the mother of the child to look at the child without any expression and not to talk to the child for three minutes. the committee determined that the mother's required task may upset the child. the irb approved the study with appropriate language in the parental permission form regarding the possibility that children might become upset. after the start of the study, the principal investigator reports to the irb that, as expected, one of the children became upset. the incident was handled according to the protocol and the child is fine. what should the irb do with regard to this report?

Should the government in china restrict the rights to the media/social media? why or why not?

1. in the debate for the student council election, a student candidate quoted explicit lyrics from a popular song. the school suspended him for two days, in line with school policy. 2. a student sued the school over its policy of holding two proms: one for african american students and one for white students. - are these civil or criminal cases? how do you know? - which court has original jurisdiction in the case: state court, federal court, or the u. s. supreme court? -. where will the case go next if it is appealed?