Were the superpower nations' (united states and soviet union) goals to be an aiding or dominant country?

(this is around the time of the north korea and south korea split. and the vietnam war)
250 words or more

They want to be Dominant Country

Explanation:

In the middle of the 'Cold war' that occurs between united states and soviet union, other countries can see that both of them constantly giving aids to smaller/weaker country. (such as when soviet union give help to cuba or when United States provided help for south Korea).

On the surface, the actions that they do might be seen as an act of kindness.

But, the main motivator for them to do it is to slowly gained alliance that are adopting a same ideology as them. When they aided a certain country, they try to influence it to conform to either their free market or communistic principles.

Because of this, I would say that their goals is to be more dominant on international scale compared to their competitor.

levels of production can be increased by technology while holding labor and capital constant, because increased technology makes the production process more efficient. subsequently, the lras curve is almost a vertical line, that can shift to the right, with an increase in technology.

the relationship between the lras curve and the ppc is that both can make the economy could grow. the ppc achieves that when it shifts outward because of more resources or technological advances while the lras curve shifts if more resources are developed or if there are technological advances.

the lras curve is a vertical line at an output level that represents the number of goods and services a nation can produce over a sustained period using all of its productive resources as efficiently as possible with all of the current technology available to it.

the production possibilities frontier (ppf) is a graphical device that is used for economic analysis of production decisions because the ppf measures the maximum possible combinations of two goods that an economy is capable of producing with its currently available resources and technology.

there are no options provided but you can choose among the following gender-neutral pronouns: zir, hir, eir, vis, tem, eir.

in the normal course of maintaining a pronoun-antecedent agreement, we could have used the words his or her but since we are also required to use gender-neutral language, we need to replace it with its equivalent gender-neutral pronoun.