Read chief justice warren’s decision from the miranda case. the entire thrust of police interrogation . . was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair his capacity for rational judgment. . [t]he choice on his part to speak to the police—was not made knowingly. what did chief justice warren say about how miranda’s confession was made? miranda was aware of his rights when he made his confession.
miranda incriminated himself intentionally and knowingly.
miranda was unaware of his rights but his confession could be used.
miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

Explanation:

When the Chief Justice Warren says " [T]he choice on his part to speak to the police—was not made knowingly. " means the police did not inform Miranda his right to not answer the police interrogation. When someone uses this right they call it "plead the Fifth" or the right against self-incrimination.

A

Explanation:

answer; ///the declaration of independence;

in this scenario it would be the consumer demand as most influential in making the decision. the band members need to figure out where and from whom they will make the most money, in other words who out of the two consumer groups - football fans or car drivers - will spend their money, who is more likely to contribute to their cause and buy what they are offering.