Social Studies, 29.01.2020 13:44 Jasten

Masked bandit.

barry, who owned a small convenience store, was robbed when a masked bandit entered his store and demanded his cash while pointing a gun at him. as the bandit ran out of the store, barry grabbed his own gun and shot the bandit in the leg. when the police arrived, barry was arrested along with the thief. barry claimed that no charges should be brought against him because his action in shooting the robber was justified. the police also searched the convenience store and found evidence of illegal drugs for which barry was arrested. when barry complained about the search, the officer in charge told him that because the state police were involved, federal constitutional rights were waived. barry is trying to obtain legal representation in an attempt to get out of jail, but cannot afford a lawyer because he just spent all his funds buying the illegal drugs for resale that have now been confiscated by the police. sam, another inmate, asks barry if the officers explained his rights to him; but barry only recalls being arrested, hustled into the police cruiser, and whisked off to jail. which of the following is true regarding barry's claim that he was engaged in a justifiable use of force?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, rubes08

20 points the two basic principles of economics are (choose two) question 2 options: a. the wants of society and individuals are limited. b. the wants of society and individuals are unlimited. c. the resources of society are limited. d. the resources of society are unlimited.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, axleon11

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:40, gleatons429

Compared with the executive and legislative branches

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00, aris35

Aresearcher conducting behavioral research collects individually identifiable sensitive information about illicit drug use and other illegal behaviors by surveying college students. one of the subjects is in an automobile accident two weeks after participating in the research study. is this an example of an unanticipated problem that requires reporting to the irb? yes, this must be reported because it was not listed as a risk of study participation in the consent form (was unexpected) and the subject experienced harm. yes, this must be reported because it involved a subject in a research study and it’s up to the irb to determine if it was related to participation. no, this does not need to be reported because it was assessed by the researcher as unrelated to the research study. no, this does not need to be reported to the irb since the researcher reported it to the sponsor of the study.

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Masked bandit.

barry, who owned a small convenience store, was robbed when a masked ban...