What if the facts were different? assume that goldsmith was hired as a computer technician solely to set up the servers. the people who hired him did not explain what they were going to do with the computers and servers. would the result be different? 1. in this scenario, goldsmith’s act was to . 2. goldsmith to facilitate copyright infringement. 3. the act, alone, a wrongful act. 4. however, goldsmith had of the plan to allow and facilitate copyright infringement. 5. under these facts, goldsmith a wrongful mental state. 6. given goldsmith’s act and mental state, goldsmith likely commit criminal copyright infringement.

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.