What was different about warfare in the early 1800s and early 1900s?

Compared to the early 1800s, war in the early 1900s:

By the early 1900s, the technological innovations in war had made it a much more deadly affair that was capable of killing many more soldiers than the early 1800s.

Improved war technology included:

These new weapons also wrecked havoc amongst civilians who were usually caught up in battle as a result of the range and destructive capability of these new weapons.

In conclusion, war in the early 1900s was much deadlier than in the early 1800s.

Find out more at link.

The correct nswer for: What was different about warfare in the early 1800s and early 1900s? Is: Military development wasn't as advanced in the 1800s, also expansionism and uprisals from colonies were the major cause of war. Also, war tactics were not as aggressive or debastating.

Explanation:

As I said before, the major cause of war in the 1800s was the independence attempts from the colonies and the battle for the rights over them. Their technology wasn't advanced even though the conquerors had thousands of years of war experience and knowledge. So, the war was more physical, and its impact was not so damaging. However, in the 1900s with the amazing military potential, the world big powers gathered, destruction was unleashed in Europe. Also, technology permitted them to create destruction and damage without precedents. War in the 1900s also included new tactics to guarantee the major amount of success in a fight and because the leaders looked for destruction and domination instead of just a fight over territory.

can you explain it better