Use examples from the lessons and your own personal experiences to compose at least one well-developed paragraph on the following:

in a federal system of government (also known as a federation), the local and state governments share power with the central government, though the central government has final authority. explain how this is different from a parliamentary system of government.

The US is a Confederation, which comprises of the relationship between free expresses that mean to establish a focal government to speak to all states in their regular requests, for example, worldwide portrayal.  

In this situation, every American state has freedom of activity in its very own region, and may even make specific state constitutions. For this situation, it is a case of saved power.  

Saved power is the power that can be practiced by states, in circles where focal government can not meddle, that is, it is the power unavoidably held for each state.

Now, I cant write a full sentence, but ill help with some details.

Explanation:

1. FEDERAL: Something that shares power with the central gov.

2. PARLIAMENTRY: Something that uses their power on their leaders.

They are different because on of them share the power.(federal) The other uses there power on there leaders.(parliamentary)

I hope this helped!

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.